Thank you very much!
It's way more complicated than I'd to deal with, so I'll leave it as is: 
crash the program if the C side gots a SIGSEGV.
Even the gRPC child seems more managable.

Ian Lance Taylor a következőt írta (2020. szeptember 17., csütörtök, 
22:11:18 UTC+2):

> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tamás Gulácsi <tgula...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Can you provide some skim of a C-side signal handler that could induce a 
> Go panic?
> > All I want is to have an error on Go side, instead of a crash (though it 
> may be safer to have a crash...).
>
> I can't think of any safe way that a C signal handler could cause a
> panic in the goroutine that called the C code that made the invalid
> memory reference.
>
> You could in principle have a C signal handler call a Go function that
> sends a message on a buffered channel that tells some other goroutine
> to panic. I think that could be safe. But it would not be safe for a
> C signal handler to call a Go function that calls panic. That would
> leave the program with most signals blocked.
>
> Ian
>
>
>
>
> > Ian Lance Taylor a következőt írta (2020. szeptember 17., csütörtök, 
> 21:00:52 UTC+2):
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:52 AM Tamás Gulácsi <tgula...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'm searching for help in https://github.com/godror/godror/issues/100 
> - I've added a recover, called debug.SetPanicOnFault, without success: the 
> extra free still panics with SIGSEGV, and the recover does not catch it (or 
> I coded it wrongly): 
> https://github.com/godror/godror/blob/2dab250ab19e158ba97699841f40c9de9d061f29/stmt.go#L306
> >> >
> >> > panic: 
> https://github.com/godror/godror/issues/100#issuecomment-694192603
> >>
> >> When a SIGSEGV occurs while running C code called via cgo, that
> >> SIGSEGV is not turned into a Go panic.
> >>
> >> It works this way both because 1) C is not a memory-safe language, and
> >> if the C code has not installed a signal handler there is no reason to
> >> think that the C code is prepared to carry on after a segmentation
> >> violation; 2) the mechanism that Go uses to turn a memory error into a
> >> panic can only work for Go code, not for C code.
> >>
> >> Ian
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "golang-nuts" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/30ca05ec-255b-4d67-b45f-89fde5396bb6n%40googlegroups.com
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/aec55e3d-10ec-4542-8e67-9bae276d1a92n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to