Great improvements. Well done. Any intentions of making methods accept additional type arguments ?
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 1:54:49 PM UTC+2 Alan Donovan wrote: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 04:31, Denis Cheremisov <denis.ch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > possibility of using angle brackets >> >> Please stop >> >> - call these operator signs “brackets” >> - pretending they are good in a role of brackets — they are not >> - spreading this nonsense from C syntax family of languages to saner >> once — yes, you heard it right. C is known for its chaotic development >> and >> lack of careful planning. >> - thinking yet another strange workaround is a good thing >> >> > On terminology: > US: [brackets], (parens). > UK: (brackets), [square brackets], > I'm sure other locales have their own equally confusing names for these > things, but the Go team is based in the US, so you can't fault them for > using that dialect. > > To the rest of your points, I will only say: arguments are more persuasive > than insults. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/4866e592-8cf5-4681-8017-b925d4089661n%40googlegroups.com.
