> We’re going to permit type switches on type parameters that have type > lists, without the “.(type)” syntax. The “(.type)” syntax exists to > clarify code like “switch v := x.(type)”.
Could you please give an example of the proposed syntax? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/87sgcdowez.fsf%40pirx.irif.fr.