No, that's not possible. A generic function can only work with *either*
built in operators *or* methods. So, you always need to have two functions:
https://go2goplay.golang.org/p/YuzSzDAOEo2
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:32 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@irif.fr> wrote:
> I'd be grateful if people could give me an example to help me understand
> the generics draft. Suppose I've got these two functions:
>
> func MemberInt(x int, a []int) bool {
> for _, v := range a {
> if v == x {
> return true
> }
> }
> return false
> }
>
> func MemberIP(x net.IP, a []net.IP) bool {
> for _, v := range a {
> if v.Equal(x) {
> return true
> }
> }
> return false
> }
>
> I can see how to write a generic "Member" function that takes an extra
> equality predicate; but is there a way to write a function that
> generalises both functions above without requiring the extra parameter?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/87v9hytrcn.fsf%40pirx.irif.fr
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAEkBMfHBjg%3Dp7HTOAfVx-q9vvnJsdcQ0ozRt_Uwsn2yF2nW6jg%40mail.gmail.com.
