The entire notion of the constraints package feels a little suspicious to
me. What if the comparable and ordered constraints were pre-declared in the
universe block, and the numeric constraint were named math.Numeric? What
other universal (or close to universal) constraints would belong in this
entirely agnostic "constraints" package?
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:30 AM <frederik.z...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The package name "constraints" is quite a mouthful to read:
>
> func Min[Elem constraints.Ordered](s []Elem) Elem {}
>
> Did you consider other package names like "is"?
>
> func Min[Elem is.Ordered](s []Elem) Elem {}
>
> is.Ordered
> is.Integer
> is.Signed
> is.Unsigned
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/fb694112-7d2f-4db0-a0fd-86fd05459ae3o%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/fb694112-7d2f-4db0-a0fd-86fd05459ae3o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
Andrei Călin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CANnvmN6bccEB7Jw-6ufAeZaGw-LqRGUDmu9_0HBoZg4_tgMurw%40mail.gmail.com.
