Apologies for replying to an old post. But I am sometimes a bit slow in reading my messages.
I too think that errcheck's is a bit severe in its treatment of deferred calls to Close(). So I forked the code and changed the behaviour to be more permissive. https://github.com/amnonbc/errcheck Feel free to use it. - amnon On Wednesday, 16 August 2017 13:05:39 UTC+1, Gert wrote: > > To pass errcheck I need to do something like > > defer func() { _ = resp.Body.Close() }() > > instead of > > defer resp.Body.Close() > > Is this something the errcheck tool can figure out to mark as valid > instead or does the errcheck tool need help from the compiler so the second > case is also ok? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/0bcd5c8f-6b9a-4690-80c4-5cb5f71d3427o%40googlegroups.com.
