Hello, recently I've created a new golang library and released it with pre-release version first to catch any bugs before doing proper 1.0.0 release.
The pre-release version was called 1.0.0-pre-release+1 , which according to https://semver.org/ should be completely legal semver. If I read the grammar correctly, it should fall under <version core> "-" <pre-release> "+" <build> with <version core> being 1.0.0, which is obviously correct. <pre-release> being pre-release, which should be ok from this chain <pre-release> ::= <dot-separated pre-release identifiers> <dot-separated pre-release identifiers> ::= <pre-release identifier> | <pre-release identifier> "." <dot-separated pre-release identifiers> <pre-release identifier> ::= <alphanumeric identifier> | <numeric identifier> <alphanumeric identifier> ::= <non-digit> | <non-digit> <identifier characters> | <identifier characters> <non-digit> | <identifier characters> <non-digit> <identifier characters> <identifier characters> ::= <identifier character> | <identifier character> <identifier characters> <identifier character> ::= <digit> | <non-digit> <non-digit> ::= <letter> | "-" so again, since all characters in pre-release fit into <non-digit>, that should be ok as well. <build> being 1 seems again obviously correct from <build identifier> ::= <alphanumeric identifier> | <digits> And despite the version being correct semver, it was mangled into pseudo-version v1.0.0-pre-release.0.20200420093620-87861123c523. However, to quote from https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Modules#can-a-module-consume-a-package-that-has-not-opted-in-to-modules > If the repository does not have any valid semver tags, then the repository's > version will be recorded with a "pseudo-version" such as > v0.0.0-20171006230638-a6e239ea1c69 I see basically 3 possibilites here: 1. Documentation is incorrect since only *subset* of semver is actually supported. 2. There is bug somewhere in the semver parsing causing my version not to be considered correct. 3. I cannot read Backus-Naur and my version is *not* correct semver. Is there something else I did miss in this analysis? W. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/b80dc21a-c1f1-44f0-82de-e968dbaa46e9%40googlegroups.com.