Thanks Ian for the fast and authoritative answer. I'll do what you suggest.

Cheers,
Tom

On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 2:31:19 AM UTC+1, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 6:22 PM Tom Payne <twp...@gmail.com <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > 
> > Go's backwards compatibility guarantee is fantastic, but only applies to 
> the language, not the standard library. How to I cause a build-time failure 
> if someone tries to build my project with a too-old Go version? 
>
> Pedantically, I would say that Go's backward compatibility does apply 
> to the standard library, but that what you are talking about is 
> forward compatibility. 
>
>
> > I have a Go project that uses (or would like to use) a few features 
> introduced in the standard library more recently, e.g. the %w verb in 
> fmt.Errorf for wrapping errors (introduced in Go 1.13), and a fix to the 
> text/template library (merged for Go 1.14). The nature of these features 
> and fixes mean that my code will compile and build fine, but will fail at 
> runtime when a codepath that relies on the feature or fix is executed, 
> which will result in a late, weird error. I would like an early, loud 
> failure at build time instead. 
> > 
> > What's the best way to achieve this? As far as I can tell, there are a 
> few options: 
> > 
> > 
> > The Go version can be determined by either the runtime.Version() 
> function or by the presence of build flags (e.g. go1.13, go1.14, etc.). 
> > 
> > 
> > Calling runtime.Version() cannot result in a build time error (it can 
> only be called once the code is running, which can only happen after a 
> successful build) but could be used in either a test (so the old Go version 
> gets caught when "go test" is run) or in an init() function to (say) panic 
> on startup when tests or the program are run. This would look something 
> like: 
> > 
> >     import "runtime" 
> > 
> >     func init() { 
> >         if runtime.Version() < "1.13" { // string comparisons are not a 
> good way to compare version strings, but you get the idea 
> >             panic("go version too old") 
> >         } 
> >     } 
> > 
> > 
> > I can create a Go file with build flags that is only built on older 
> versions of Go, something like: 
> > 
> >     // +build !go1.13 
> > 
> >     build with go 1.13 or later // this is deliberately not valid go 
> syntax 
> > 
> > This causes an error if built with an earlier version of Go than 1.13, 
> but the error message isn't very intuitive (something like 
> "filename.go:3:1: expected 'package', found build") and the invalid Go 
> syntax might confuse other Go tooling which tends to assume that every .go 
> file contains more-or-less valid Go code. 
> > 
> > 
> > Please note that I want to use these Go standard library features and 
> fixes and provide an early, loud warning if they are not available. I know 
> that I can use build flags to provide different code to different Go 
> versions, but if I do that then I still have to maintain code for older Go 
> versions. The core of this question is: how do I get a build error if my Go 
> version is too old? 
> > 
> > 
> > What's the recommended way to ensure a minimum Go version at build time? 
> One of the above suggestions or another way? 
>
>
> I think that most people use build tags, but instead of introducing a 
> compilation error, they either provide reduced functionality when 
> built with older Go versions, or they write something like 
>
> const s = "this package requires Go 1.14" + 0 
>
> Ian 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/99265a86-1f78-407f-8b70-6152a595c99a%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to