Hi all,

I want to share the performances analysis I recently did for SFTPGo, the 
fully featured and highly configurable SFTP server written in Go 
(https://github.com/drakkan/sftpgo).

When I decided to write an SFTP server I evaluated the available libraries 
and I did some quick performance tests too.

Golang's SSH stack and pkg/sftp were able to easily saturate a Gigabit 
connection and this seemed enough. I noticed that OpenSSH was faster, but I 
didn't investigate further.

So I chose Golang for SFTPGo.

The project is growing fast and one of the users also noticed that SFTPGo 
has lower performance than OpenSSH. He opened an issue providing some stats 
when using a 40Gb Ethernet card.

I did some more profiling and discovered that the main bottlenecks are, 
unsurprisingly, the cipher used and the message authentication. So we can 
have a huge performance boost using a fast cipher with implicit messages 
authentication, for example aes128-...@openssh.com, however this cipher is 
not widely supported.

The most used cipher, and the one used in the user's tests is AES-CTR, and 
the Golang implementations seems quite slow.

He noticed that an unmerged patch is available for Golang, greatly 
improving AES-CTR performance:

https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/51670

I applied this patch and, while performance improved, the AES-CTR SFTP 
transfers were still slower than the AES-GCM ones. The bottleneck is now 
the MAC computation.

The tested hardware supports Intel SHA extensions but Golang's SHA256 
implementation only uses the AVX2 extension.

Again, I was lucky: I can simply use minio/sha256-simd as a drop-in 
replacement for Golang's SHA256 implementation:

https://github.com/drakkan/crypto/commit/17ef3d252b1c9d6124fa17889033e11eaa5c9ddb

The performance improved again, but OpenSSH was still faster.

To my great surprise I noticed that my very simple SCP implementation 
(https://github.com/drakkan/sftpgo/blob/master/sftpd/scp.go) was now as 
fast as OpenSSH!

So this time I have to look at pkg/sftp: I found some extraneous 
copies/allocations in critical paths and I sent some pull requests that are 
now merged in the master branch. Still, SFTP transfers were slower than 
OpenSSH ones.

Compared to my SCP implementation the main difference is that pkg/sftp 
allocates a new slice for each SFTP packet, while my SCP implementation 
allocates a slice once and then reuses this slice. 

Basically for each SFTP packet pkg/sftp does something like this:

data := make([]byte, size)

So I wrote a proof of concept allocator that tries to avoid all these extra 
allocations reusing the previously allocated slices:

https://github.com/drakkan/sftp/blob/master/allocator.go

And bingo! Now SFTPGo performance is very close to OpenSSH! You can find 
the full benchmark results here:

https://github.com/drakkan/sftpgo/blob/master/docs/performance.md

Conclusion: I see several complaints about Go performance, especially 
compared to Rust, but, at least in my use case, Go can be as fast as a C 
project (such as OpenSSH). But some special attention is required and thus 
this improved performance is not by default available to all the users.

Now some questions:

1) for the pkg/sftp allocator I'm discussing with pkg/sftp maintainers to 
find a way to get it included. Do you have smarter ideas to avoid these 
allocations?
2) There is a patch available for AES-CTR in Golang (since 2017): I wonder 
why it is not yet merged?
3) To improve SHA computation performance, I cannot find anything usable in 
Golang itself. Is there any plan to have support for Intel SHA Extensions 
and AVX512 directly in Golang anytime soon?

Thank you for this great programming language, it makes it really simple to 
add new features to SFTPGo!

regards,
Nicola

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/7cfdd60d-7415-4c2f-bd7d-9d0372461a3c%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to