// I don't want to get into the specific syntax of the test code directly,
// but a test would start execution here, supplying "lines" and "thing2"
//
mystep2 with: lines, thing2 // <---------- hide all local variables
from above except for lines and thing2
mymap := make(map[string]int)
for _, line := range lines {
if strings.Contains(line, thing2) {
count := strings.Count(line, thing2)
mymap[line] = count
}
}
// and the test would end here -- because the next line is another "with"
(or return) statement
// it would be able to do Asserts and such on the variables within the
scope of this code segment
Ian,
An alternative approach would be to have:
mystep2 with: lines, thing2 => mymap
to specify all of the intermediate variables of interest for the test.
These testable code chunks, delimited by *with* statements, act like hidden
*func*s. The actual call could be something like *test_doSomeStuff@mystep2*
Warren
> I feel like there is something missing here. How do you write a test
> that uses a with statement?
>
> Ian
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/f18a9af6-240b-4f3c-a011-6d68ed69784e%40googlegroups.com.
