Well, Cassandra has a rewrite in C++ ScyllaDB hat performs many times better so that particular example isn't really helping the GC case.
I don't mind the GC myself but I hear the "GC is actually faster" often and it seems not to be true in the wild although I am sure theoretical cases can be envisioned. On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, 16:06 Kevin Chadwick, <m8il1i...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2020-02-12 14:02, Robert Engels wrote: > > Most of that is because their codebase predates Java. There are more > modern dbs > > like Cassandra that are in Java. Certainly Hadoop is probably the largest > > distributed database in the world and it’s written in Java. > > Bound to use more cpu cycles and memory than a c equivalent. Of course > postgres > is more capable. > > > https://blog.timescale.com/blog/time-series-data-cassandra-vs-timescaledb-postgresql-7c2cc50a89ce/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/f388606c-7f52-78bc-f59c-776688114e4f%40gmail.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAKOF695amjn_FvHrh1S2x41knXOQ9Dq-yX2%2Bfh5jDL_dDJenaA%40mail.gmail.com.
