On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:51 AM roger peppe <rogpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I believe that the main reason that equality isn't defined on maps (and 
> slices) is to preserve the future possibility that equality might work at a 
> whole-value level rather than on a reference level. I suspect that one of 
> these days a final decision will be made...

I would say that slightly differently.  Equality of reference types is
ambiguous.  Does slice or map equality mean equality of reference or
equality of value?  Different programs want different choices; neither
is obviously correct.  So the language doesn't make a choice.

Ian


> On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 23:42, 'Kevin Regan' via golang-nuts 
> <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>> I just ran into this... ...makes me like go a little less.
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 6:34:03 AM UTC-7 mi...@daglabs.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry for bumping a very old thread, but I absolutely disagree with the 
>>> people stating that this problem is contrived, and I got here from a Google 
>>> search, so this might be relevant for some people.
>>>
>>> A very real use-case for reference-comparing maps is when testing .Clone() 
>>> methods. You want to make sure that the clone is an actual clone, and that 
>>> all the properties of the cloned object are also a clone, etc. In these 
>>> cases you want to reference-compare everything.
>>>
>>> That said, reflect.ValueOf(xxx).Pointer is more than sufficient for this 
>>> use-case.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, July 15, 2013 at 3:50:01 AM UTC+3, Yi DENG wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There're always something that is not comparable. You can consider map as 
>>>> one of this. If you have to check, use the pointer form.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, July 13, 2013 7:35:55 PM UTC+8, Jsor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I ask for maps because for slices this seems potentially problematic: 
>>>>> what does "same reference" entail for a slice? Overlapping underlying 
>>>>> arrays? Same starting pointer regardless of whether their len matches? 
>>>>> Same start, end, len, and cap? And so on. Though I guess 
>>>>> "reference-equality" would be pretty well defined for channels.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, for maps determining "sameness" at a reference level seems like 
>>>>> a much more well defined question, and a much simpler one to answer. Yet 
>>>>> I can't figure out a good way to do it. Perhaps with 
>>>>> reflect.Value.UnsafePointer (would that even work)? Either way, that 
>>>>> seems like overcomplicating things. The "easiest" way to do it seems to 
>>>>> be something like this, dreamt up on the go-nuts IRC when I asked this: 
>>>>> http://play.golang.org/p/6Ffxfx7zBb
>>>>>
>>>>> But I think we can all agree that that's a rather silly and limited 
>>>>> solution (and to be fair wasn't suggested in earnest).
>>>>>
>>>>> I can see why == isn't defined on maps, too many people would likely 
>>>>> mistake it for a deep equality test (if that was indeed the reason), but 
>>>>> it seems like there should be some semi-trivial way to see if two map 
>>>>> variables refer to the same map. Perhaps a need just wasn't seen for such 
>>>>> an operation? Maybe it's really a more difficult/expensive test than I 
>>>>> assumed?
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/a1f4e265-4523-41be-a67a-f43610fd430a%40googlegroups.com.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAJhgacgt5ddXTGEr5nXxS3UCxRqcBkzZcyhYU70jbcejT0r87A%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcVNdNHtX4tQu15u7GYUTPy29YPQXsCPibWrdxRmRwUtDQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to