Michael Jones <michael.jo...@gmail.com>:
> Python, to its credit, has the nice inclusive property of extensible
> interpreters of being friendly to "hang things" onto just like ornaments on
> trees. By linking with C/C++-libraries and adding glue/shim code, anything
> can be used from Python. This facility and interpretive execution (as Eric
> Johnson observed above) makes it a natural for discovery and trying of
> things.
>
> These virtues may seem less so in eventual deployments, at scale, and in
> other cases.
True, and connects directly to my recent experience report.
Python was the best language to prototype reposurgeon in,
but scale pressure forced the move to Go.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/20200127185435.GA44021%40thyrsus.com.
