On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 6:24 AM Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> I’m pretty sure Nats.io has all of the same delivery guarantees as > rabbitmq. What design is not accommodated by mats? > Any design that needs flow control is not accommodated by Nats.io. I've used Nats extensively and consider it fundamentally flawed for data conveyance. It is only suitable for very light weight control messages that do not need to be delivered; where the application logic handles the retries instead of TCP. Push any kind of data through Nats, and its lack of flow control means it will drop most all of your data on the floor. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAPNEFAZcYLO%3DVkkeC4TzG0Tv8JxrrHoopRnV-mjTCOCnXAZO1Q%40mail.gmail.com.
