On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 at 2:17:58 PM UTC-6, Burak Serdar wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:36 PM B Carr <buc...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm mostly interested in the degree of insulation one goroutine has from
> another. My extensive reading indicates that absent a goroutine
> intentionally communicating outside of itself (via a channel), that
> whatever it does (short of making changes to globally accessible resources
> such as a database or map) can't be seen by other goroutines. Is that a
> correct assessment?
>
> Not precisely. The shared resource doesn't have to be global, but
> simply accessible from more than one goroutine.
>
> i:=1
> go func() { do something with i } ()
> go func() { do something else with i} ()
>
> The variable i is not global but shared between three goroutines (the
> two, and the one that spawned the other two). Any modification done to
> i by one goroutine has no guarantees to being seen by others unless
> there is synchronization.
>
Ahhhh, a subtle misunderstanding on my part. Thank you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/fb1de7ea-d4f8-416b-8936-61b6cea9388f%40googlegroups.com.
