On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:16 AM Zihan Yang <whois.zihan.y...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I tried to evaluate the performance with lru & without lru, the > performance with a global lru is 10x slower than without lru at all. > > This would make me step back a bit and revisit my initial plan. If a global cache isn't helping, what evidence is there a thread-local cache would? Said another way, the work you are caching must have a certain computational overhead to it, which warrants a cache in the first place. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGrdgiXW63p660v1OX_tZAMOXxFJp6vzZk-%3DftrEiTWZhKCiaQ%40mail.gmail.com.
