https://github.com/davecheney/junk/tree/master/id 
<https://github.com/davecheney/junk/tree/master/id> but see the warnings. 

Still, I would use mutex and shared caches until you can prove that the costs 
matter before resorting to the library.

You might be interested in github.com/robaho/go-concurrency-test

> On Jul 23, 2019, at 9:55 PM, Zihan Yang <whois.zihan.y...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> CGO sounds good, but I remember CGO invocation is not cheap? (not sure where 
> I saw it).
> 
> Would you provide a reference to "Chaney id project"? I don't find much 
> information about it.
> 
> I will look into the named goroutine discussion.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 在 2019年7月24日星期三 UTC+8上午1:52:35,Robert Engels写道:
> You will need to use CGo. See Chaney “id” project for ideas. Since the 
> underlying OS threads are shared and will not be switched while in the C code 
> it is fairly straightforward but having a robust typed cache will be 
> problematic. 
> 
> There are discussions on golang-dev about named Go routines which might be a 
> workaround, but so far the TLS (or PLS) discussion has been a non starter. 
> 
> On Jul 23, 2019, at 12:10 PM, Zihan Yang <whois.z...@gmail.com <>> wrote:
> 
>> I am trying to implement an LRU cache. Several global lru lists could be 
>> accessed concurrently by multiple goroutines, which could be a disaster in a 
>> machine with 24 or more cores.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Therefore, it would be great if I can add the item to P-local storage and 
>> flush the batched item into the lru list as a whole. This should greatly 
>> reduce the contention for the global lru list.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> How can I do it? I saw some related github issues, #8281 
>> <https://github.com/golang/go/issues/8281> and #21355 
>> <https://github.com/golang/go/issues/21355>, which leads me to a project 
>> called gls <https://github.com/jtolds/gls>, but the code seems too much to 
>> integrate into my project (actually I'd better not include any third-party 
>> package to avoid potential law issues). Is there any built-in way to achieve 
>> this?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to golan...@googlegroups.com <>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c79d3801-2f03-43fd-8dd8-35904b481341%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c79d3801-2f03-43fd-8dd8-35904b481341%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/bd54928f-cac5-4886-9252-04812f72b299%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/bd54928f-cac5-4886-9252-04812f72b299%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/B815A880-D5D2-4DA5-BE7A-041335EE48EE%40ix.netcom.com.

Reply via email to