On Thursday, July 4, 2019 at 5:14:40 PM UTC+2, Michael Ellis wrote: > > In my view, saving a few keystrokes is not the reason to support such a > test. I've already got an editor snippet that generates a default "if err > != nil ... " clause. >
The goal of the try proposal is not to "save a few keystrokes". The goal is to reduce error handling verbosity when reading code. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/d01e3498-3f04-45ad-867b-7b85b3b14399%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
