They matched up until yesterday. When I updated at 2am California time it
changed. It also had no "0o" octal literals up until the latest.
I'd planned to joke how the race was on to be the first to check in a new
octal literal in my mail, but a few of those snuck in too.
Yesterday:
Count | Frequency | Detail
---:|---:|---
929548 | 19.7889% | ,
574886 | 12.2386% | .
* 544819 | 11.5985% | ( 544819 | 11.5985% | ) *
* 352547 | 7.5053% | { 352547 | 7.5053% | } *
288042 | 6.1321% | =
253563 | 5.3980% | :
155297 | 3.3061% | :=
*138465 | 2.9478% | [ 138465 | 2.9478% | ] *
78567 | 1.6726% | !=
72007 | 1.5329% | *
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:51 PM Volker Dobler <dr.volker.dob...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Cool work!
>
> What I found most astonishing on a first look: Not all
> parentheses ( are closed: 4 ) seem to be missing??
> For { 5 are unclosed while there is one more ] than [ ?
>
> Are you parsing testfiles with deliberate errors?
>
> V.
>
> On Wednesday, 12 June 2019 15:08:44 UTC+2, Michael Jones wrote:
>>
>> I've been working on a cascade of projects, each needing the next as a
>> part, the most recent being rewriting text.Scanner. It was not a goal, but
>> the existing scanner does not do what I need (recognize Go operators,
>> number types, and more) and my shim code was nearly as big as the standard
>> library scanner itself, so I just sat down an rewrote it cleanly.
>>
>> To test beyond hand-crafted edge cases it seemed good to try it against a
>> large body of Go code. I chose the Go 1.13 code base, and because the
>> results are interesting on their own beyond my purpose of code testing, I
>> thought to share what I've noticed as a Github Gist on the subject of the
>> "Go Popularity Contest"—what are the most used types, most referenced
>> packages, most and least popular operators, etc. The data are interesting,
>> but I'll let it speak for itself. Find it here:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/MichaelTJones/ca0fd339401ebbe79b9cbb5044afcfe2
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> P.S. Generated by go test. I just cut off the "passed" line and posted
>> it. ;-)
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Michael T. jonesmichae...@gmail.com*
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/1a0e2b4b-9276-4418-929c-51888cf2c93a%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/1a0e2b4b-9276-4418-929c-51888cf2c93a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CALoEmQw3S8TpL9nnqT7yxwRJ%3DOBb3mj4YP_iGJEfUtJqQNx14A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
