* Marvin Renich <m...@renich.org> [190609 20:40]: > Is it already a known issue that a «for [true] { ... }» loop whose only > exit path is through return statements inside the loop (i.e. no break > statement) will produce the compiler error "missing return at end of > function" if you don't put a meaningless "return ..." statement after > the loop? > > If this issue is not already known, will someone who has a github > account please file this issue for me? > > Thanks...Marvin
Sorry for the noise; this was my mistake. The error was being reported in a different file than the one I had just edited, so I attributed the error to the wrong code. ...Marvin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/20190610004556.nqynkhou4x53wtal%40basil.wdw. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.