Hello, I'm not sure that Min and Max need to be in the 80%. It's annoying to write them repeatedly, but they are also very short. The place where I typically miss generics is larger chunks of code, such as concurrency patterns. I'm certain others are looking at datatypes. Why do Min and Max need to be in the 80%?
Robert On Thursday, 30 May 2019 14:26:34 UTC-4, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > One of my guidelines for an acceptable generics proposal is that > people can write Min and Max. Your proposal admits that it doesn't > permit that. I think that is a problem. I'm fine with the general > idea of "do 80% of the job" but in practice people really do want to > write Min and Max. I think they are part of the 80% that needs to be > handled, not the 20% that can be omitted. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/e91e761e-92cd-452a-a387-e0741ebacd66%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.