I was thrown of by the previous comment. I think i will create some "atomic" types that handle using mutexes with setter and getter methods. Thanks Jan
On Sunday, May 26, 2019 at 9:17:44 PM UTC+3, Jan Mercl wrote: > > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 8:05 PM Sotirios Mantziaris > <smant...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > > From what i understand you propose to create a new object and switch out > the old one with the new one using the atomic package of go. > > That cannot work. String is a multi word value. There's nothing in the > atomic package that can update a multi word value. However, a pointer > to anything _can_ be updated atomically. > > You cannot "safely" cheat on the data race. As said before, you must > synchronize (the readers vs writers). There's no other option. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/57967151-532b-4e32-bbed-f4c0eb2a7038%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
