hang on, sorry to be so chatty on this but I'm learning a lot about handling edge cases from this, so I need to comment further
ok, I got it working for that test also: https://play.golang.org/p/nd_EuCSOWto I can tell by the fact you used the 'sync' keyword that you didn't in fact test what you wrote, but the above completes the code and shows the condition is handled. On Sunday, 5 May 2019 12:27:10 UTC+2, Jan Mercl wrote: > > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:06 PM Louki Sumirniy > <louki.sumi...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > > Is there ANY other use case for waitgroup other than preventing a > goroutine leak or ensuring that it empties the channels at the end of > execution? > > I don't think this question is related to the correctness of your > shorter implementation of WaitGroup. Anyway, what about such code? > > var wg sync.WaitGroup > > func main() { > defer wg.Wait() > > if someCondition { > for i := 0; i < 4; i++ { > wg.Add(1) > go worker(i) > } > } > ... > } > > func worker(i int) { > defer wg.Done() > > ... > } > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
