On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:48 PM Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> I think the OP was implying that GC is inefficient and was inquiring about 
> certain patterns of memory use could be freed more efficiently.

I see.  I wouldn't worry about it, at least not without clear evidence
of some problem.  The cost of GC is very roughly proportional to the
size of live memory.  Actually freeing non-live memory is essentially,
well, free.

Ian

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to