On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 12:57:51 AM UTC+1, David Collier-Brown 
wrote:
>
> It's a known bad thing to defer a close for anything buffered, as 
> discussed at https://www.joeshaw.org/dont-defer-close-on-writable-files/
> but some constructs lack a Sync() call.
>
>
Note from the Linux close documentation:

Not checking the return value of close() is a common but nevertheless 
serious programming error. It is quite possible that errors on a previous 
write <https://linux.die.net/man/2/write>(2) operation are first reported 
at the final close(). Not checking the return value when closing the file 
may lead to silent loss of data. This can especially be observed with NFS 
and with disk quota.

A successful close does not guarantee that the data has been successfully 
saved to disk, as the kernel defers writes. It is not common for a file 
system to flush the buffers when the stream is closed. If you need to be 
sure that the data is physically stored use fsync 
<https://linux.die.net/man/2/fsync>(2). (It will depend on the disk 
hardware at this point.)

> [...]


Manlio Perillo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to