Executable is not derivative work to stdlib or anything. Go's repo license covers only repo. Stdlib is not redistributed when you compile binary. It has nothing to do with GPL. Go's license is simple and clear.
ср, 27 февр. 2019 г., 6:00 Dan Kortschak <d...@kortschak.io>: > Probably not. The executable is a derivative work under most > understandings (this is the basis for the GPL to require that source > code be provided if the executable is distributed to an end user). > > Any work writen in Go, using the stdlib (which includes runtime, so all > Go programs) is derivative of the stdlib. This means that the Go > license pertains. > > On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 18:35 -0800, Space A. wrote: > > You are wrong. > > > > > > среда, 27 февраля 2019 г., 5:22:12 UTC+3 пользователь Ian Denhardt > > написал: > > > > > > > > > Quoting Space A. (2019-02-26 20:58:40) > > > > > > > > > > > and stdlib only when redistributed separately as a whole in > > > > binary > > > > form. When stdlib is used to compile regular binary, it's not > > > > "redistributed" > > > This is not my understanding; in general static linking > > > constitutes > > > distribution (though you are correct re: compiler output of your > > > own > > > code). > > > > > > > > > > > Correct answer > > > The "correct answer," really, is to ask someone actually qualified > > > to > > > give you legal advice. > > > > > > -Ian > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
