On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:20 PM Justin Israel <justinisr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:32 PM Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:18 PM Justin Israel <justinisr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I've got a service that I have been testing quite a lot over the last
>> few days. Only after I handed it off for some testing to a colleague, was
>> he able to produce a SIGBUS panic that I had not seen before:
>> >
>> > go 1.11.2 linux/amd64
>> >
>> > The service does set up its own SIGINT/SIGTERM handling via the typical
>> siginal.Notify approach. The nature of the program is that it listens on
>> nats.io message queues, and receives requests to run tasks as
>> sub-processes. My tests have been running between 40-200 of these instances
>> over the course of a few days. But this panic occurred on a completely
>> different machine that those I had been testing...
>> >
>> > goroutine 1121 [runnable (scan)]:
>> > fatal error: unexpected signal during runtime execution
>> > panic during panic
>> > [signal SIGBUS: bus error code=0x2 addr=0xfa2adc pc=0x451637]
>> >
>> > runtime stack:
>> > runtime.throw(0xcf7fe3, 0x2a)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/panic.go:608 +0x72
>> > runtime.sigpanic()
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/signal_unix.go:374 +0x2f2
>> > runtime.gentraceback(0xffffffffffffffff, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0,
>> 0xc0004baa80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x64, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/traceback.go:190 +0x377
>> > runtime.traceback1(0xffffffffffffffff, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0,
>> 0xc0004baa80, 0x0)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/traceback.go:728 +0xf3
>> > runtime.traceback(0xffffffffffffffff, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0,
>> 0xc0004baa80)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/traceback.go:682 +0x52
>> > runtime.tracebackothers(0xc00012e780)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/traceback.go:947 +0x187
>> > runtime.dopanic_m(0xc00012e780, 0x42dcc2, 0x7f83f6ffc808, 0x1)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/panic.go:805 +0x2aa
>> > runtime.fatalthrow.func1()
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/panic.go:663 +0x5f
>> > runtime.fatalthrow()
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/panic.go:660 +0x57
>> > runtime.throw(0xcf7fe3, 0x2a)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/panic.go:608 +0x72
>> > runtime.sigpanic()
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/signal_unix.go:374 +0x2f2
>> > runtime.gentraceback(0xffffffffffffffff, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0,
>> 0xc0004baa80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x7fffffff, 0x7f83f6ffcd00, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/traceback.go:190 +0x377
>> > runtime.scanstack(0xc0004baa80, 0xc000031270)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/mgcmark.go:786 +0x15a
>> > runtime.scang(0xc0004baa80, 0xc000031270)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/proc.go:947 +0x218
>> > runtime.markroot.func1()
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/mgcmark.go:264 +0x6d
>> > runtime.markroot(0xc000031270, 0xc000000047)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/mgcmark.go:245 +0x309
>> > runtime.gcDrain(0xc000031270, 0x6)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/mgcmark.go:882 +0x117
>> > runtime.gcBgMarkWorker.func2()
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/mgc.go:1858 +0x13f
>> > runtime.systemstack(0x7f83f7ffeb90)
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:351 +0x66
>> > runtime.mstart()
>> >         /vol/apps/go/1.11.2/src/runtime/proc.go:1229
>> >
>> > Much appreciated for any insight.
>>
>> Is the problem repeatable?
>>
>> It looks like it crashed while tracing back the stack during garbage
>> collection, but I don't know why since the panic was evidently able to
>> trace back the stack just fine.
>>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately it was rare and never happened in my
> own testing of thousands of runs of this service. The colleague that saw
> this crash on one of his workstations was not able to repro it after
> attempting another run of the workflow. I wasn't really sure how to debug
> this particular crash since it was in the gc and I have seen a "panic
> during panic" before. Thought it might jump out at someone.
>

Oops. I meant that I *haven't* seen a "panic during panic" before :-)


>
>> Ian
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to