Absolutely what I was going to say.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 6:32 AM Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Breaks backwards compatibility as the switch may already be in a for loop
> and using continue...
>
> On Nov 26, 2018, at 11:50 PM, Göcs Jëss <laurengoc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We might as well reduce a one rarely used keyword
>
> continue means recommence or resume after interruption *by google*
>
> if a continue triggers, the switch, select, or for loop statement
> *resumes* another case or condition
>
> we could do continues inside switch statements
>
> switch 1 {case 1:
> continuecase 0:}
>
>
> we could do continues as well inside select statements
>
> select {case a := <-c1:
> continuecase b := <-c2:
> // X
> }
>
>
> we could still do continues inside for loop statements
>
> for { continue
> }
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
*Michael T. jonesmichael.jo...@gmail.com <michael.jo...@gmail.com>*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
