On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:00 AM Scott Cotton <w...@iri-labs.com> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 18 October 2018 08:00:56 UTC+2, Beoran wrote: >> >> After reading his proposal, I think you should help Burak Sedar work out his >> proposal in the other thread. > > > Where is Burak Sedar's proposal?
https://gist.github.com/bserdar/8f583d6e8df2bbec145912b66a8874b3 > > > >> >> It is conceptually a lot easier than the idea of contracts, but likely to be >> more powerful even. To me it has the ideal Go-like feel and it solves the >> problem with operator overloading in one stroke. Use concrete types, >> including primitive types as "contracts". That is a brilliant idea to me. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
