On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 1:26 PM, jclc via golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > Currently I don't use them, but couldn't binary packages be used to > distribute CGO-dependent packages for developers who might not have a C > cross-compiler? I think the feature would be more commonly used if it wasn't > so impractical. Rather than abandoning the feature I'd like to see it > revamped to work well with modules.
You shouldn't need to use binary packages for that. It's OK to distribute C code as a binary, as a .syso file. The issue is there is distributing the Go code as a binary. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
