Note that the check/handle proposal has largely prompted counter-proposals and critique... https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Go2ErrorHandlingFeedback
So I'd guess that the final product will look rather different :-) On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 7:54:54 AM UTC-7, Chris Hopkins wrote: > > Thanks. Yes, that's exactly what I want, could I have Go2 now please? ;-) > > Okay I'll keep doing it the way I'm doing it with a mind to swapping to > that when available. > > I had avoided reading the Go2 proposal stuff simply because I regard > language design as a question for people with Marvin-like intellects. > That's way less scary than the generics proposals that worry me so much. > > Thanks again > > On Monday, 8 October 2018 15:33:07 UTC+1, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:38 AM, Chris Hopkins <cbeho...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > Could I please check what current error handling best practice is? >> ... >> > Any suggestions gratefully received. >> >> Have you seen the error handling thoughts at >> https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft.md ? >> The thoughts about "errors as values" seems relevant here. >> >> Ian >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
