I was wrong too. Though I’m now puzzled about the UCLA book. It’s in my library. Will look.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:06 AM Rob Pike <r...@golang.org> wrote: > No, I was thinking of Occam but being wrong. > > -rob > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:52 PM roger peppe <rogpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 8 October 2018 at 08:53, Rob Pike <r...@golang.org> wrote: >> > Actually the original is a paper: >> > https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~crary/819-f09/Hoare78.pdf >> > The book came later and is substantially different although not >> > contradictory. Channels were not in the paper and without channels >> (such as >> > in Occam) the flavor is very different. >> >> FWIW Occam does have channels; they're just not first class values. >> >> Perhaps you're thinking of Erlang, which I think was inspired more >> directly by the paper? >> > -- *Michael T. jonesmichael.jo...@gmail.com <michael.jo...@gmail.com>* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
