[Bcc: drchase]
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:55:26 +0200
"Wojciech S. Czarnecki" <o...@fairbe.org> wrote:
> func Min(a, b T) T {
`func Min(a, b type T) type T` of course.
Late correction but needed.
> for type switch {
> case T func(T) Less(T) T:
> return a.Less(b)
> }
> if a < b {
> return a
> }
> return b
> }
The `func Min(a, b T) T ` was valid at first hours of CGG proposal life.
Then, there, both compiler and user were directed to line below
with `for type` construct to differentiate between generic/non generic.
It would be bad for compiler though. And for reader, as in the next step
contract scope emerged.
TC,
--
Wojciech S. Czarnecki
<< ^oo^ >> OHIR-RIPE
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
