@Jon mostly to keep the syntactic spirit of the current proposal. I don’t
have strong opinions on that.
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 3:56:26 PM UTC-4, Jon Conradt wrote:
>
> Why:
>
> func Sum(type T numeric)(x []T) T {
>
>
> and not just
>
> func Sum(x []T type numeric) T {
>
>
> or
>
> func Sum(x []T Numeric) T {
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 11:57:02 AM UTC-7, Matt Sherman wrote:
>>
>> Here’s a riff on generics focused on builtin typeclasses (instead of user
>> contracts): https://clipperhouse.com/go-generics-typeclasses/
>>
>> Feedback welcome.
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
