On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Hoo Luu <qq510371...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 在 2018年8月15日星期三 UTC+8上午12:43:37，Mark Volkmann写道:
>
> > var color = temperature > 100 ? “red” : “blue”
>
>
> Although this feature will not be accepted, we could just talk about
> it. I prefer 'if-expression' to ternary.
>
> var color = if temperature > 100 { "red" } else { "blue" }
>
> vs. current if statement syntax:
>
> var color
> if temperature > 100 {
> color = "red"
> } else {
> color = "blue"
> }
>
I get the impression that the real issue here is that gofmt will break
if temperature > 100 { color = "red" } else { color = "blue" }
over multiple lines and that what the people asking for a ternary
operator really want is a one-liner. So ask yourselves, if gofmt were
to format your ternary operator (or the above suggested if-expression)
identical to the if statement, i.e. across the same number of lines,
would you still want it?
var color =
if temperature > 100 {
"red"
} else {
"blue"
}
var color =
temperature > 100 ?
"red"
:
"blue"
If you would NOT use these, your real issue is with gofmt, not the Go
language.
MSB
--
To understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
