So, the fastest way on the compile-side for making collections of functions (optionally, tied to some common data type) is using closures? I thought so also, that's the direction I went instead of interfaces in my own work for the same reason.
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 16:52:44 UTC+3, Max wrote: > > About the "other languages extensions": > > it's obviously easier than modifying the official Go compiler, but it's > usually still a major task, > especially if it involves modifying the "poor man's compiler" fast.Comp > which converts a parsed ast.Node into a tree of function closures for > execution. > > If you have a specific example in mind and you describe it, I can be more > specific. > > On Saturday, April 28, 2018 at 11:59:41 PM UTC+2, Maxim Khitrov wrote: >> >> Do you have examples of adding custom ":xyz" or other language >> extensions? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
