The freetype license looks it's a BSD derivative. That license would be more consistent with the static linking used by gc, so since you can choose either the freetype license or the GPL 2+, if it's not against your ideals, the FTL is probably the better choice. Note that because oksvg imports rasterx, oksvg can not be distributed under another license.
On Mon, 2018-04-23 at 17:19 -0700, Steven Wiley wrote: > As for the license part of it...(snnzz......, huh, what?) Oh yes, > the > rasterx package has parts that are straight copies, and parts that > are > somewhat modified from the freetype raster package, as well as parts > that > are completely new. So, I think I need to stay within the terms of > the > freetype license for that bit. Apparently, freetype wants > derivatives to > use their license, or GPL 2.0 or higher, so I just selected the > highest > GPL open on github, and also kept around a copy of their terms. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
