Thanks Jan, So if this is a "just" a mutex, this whole thing will not be atomic - it would introduce intermediate (albeit invisible) between "<-" parts. I was hoping for the "edge collapse" here.
Andrey On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 12:08:13 AM UTC-7, Jan Mercl wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:47 AM Andrey Tcherepanov < > xnow4f...@sneakemail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > > ch <- <-ch // Is this an atomic operation? > > Channel send and receive operations are safe wrt to concurrency. That may > be seen atomic in a certain sense: only one goroutine at a time can ever > perform such operation on a given channel without having to coordinate with > any other goroutine - because internally the operation is guarded by a > mutex. > > -- > > -j > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
