On Friday, February 16, 2018 at 3:27:04 PM UTC+2, dc0d wrote:
>
> Why sync.Once uses a sync.Mutex in addition to atomic functions?
>
> What are the drawbacks/shortcomings/deficiencies of this implementation? 
>
> type Once struct {
>  done uint32
> }
>
>
> func (o *Once) Do(f func()) {
>  if !atomic.CompareAndSwapUint32(&o.done, 0, 1) {
>  return
>  }
>  f()
> }
>
>

You implementation returns immediately, if f() is still running, while in 
original implementation all concurrent calls to Do() returns when f() 
return.

Djadala

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to