Hey Gregg I think that would make it more clear and looks great. I wouldn't want to take credit for your copy, but I'd be happy to open an issue / PR with this change. I'm not sure how to best attribute it to you.
Cheers! -Tim On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 2:35:47 PM UTC-8, Gregg Townsend wrote: > > You're right. I do think expanding the section on method sets is > worthwhile because that section *seems* to have the complete set of > rules. But any addition needs to be clear, concise *and* correct. How > about: > > ... Additionally, an addressable > <https://golang.org/ref/spec#Address_operators> value of type T can be > used to call methods declared with receiver type *T (see *calls* > <https://golang.org/ref/spec#Calls>). > > > On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 2:44:26 PM UTC-7, Axel Wagner wrote: >> >> That sentence wouldn't be true, though. There is a call-expression >> shorthand, but the method does not actually get added to T - so, for example >> >> var b bytes.Buffer >> b.WriteString("foo") // fine >> (&b).WriteString("foo") // the same, as it's just syntactic sugare >> r := strings.NewReader("foo") >> io.Copy(b, r) // error: bytes.Buffer does not implement io.Writer, Write >> has pointer receiver >> io.Copy(&b, r) // fine >> >> Method sets are relevant for interface implementation. >> >> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:34 PM, <gtow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This issue once puzzled me, too. It would help to add something to the >>> spec section on method sets <https://golang.org/ref/spec#Method_sets>. >>> I suggest something like this at the very end of the second paragraph: >>> >>> ... Additionally, if a receiver of type T is *addressable >>> <https://golang.org/ref/spec#Address_operators>*, its method set is >>> effectively extended to include the method set of *T (see *calls >>> <https://golang.org/ref/spec#Calls>*). >>> >>> >>> On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 12:53:32 PM UTC-7, Paul Jolly wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Take a look at https://golang.org/ref/spec#Calls: >>>> >>>> "A method call x.m() is valid if the method set of (the type of) x >>>> contains m and the argument list can be assigned to the parameter list of >>>> m. If x is addressable and &x's method set contains m, x.m() is shorthand >>>> for (&x).m()" >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "golang-nuts" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.