I've followed badger since it's beta and the discussions it emitted. Those "lines" and discussions, alongside it's history, do not provide the most happy influence that one would hope for.
On Sunday, January 21, 2018 at 7:51:52 PM UTC+3:30, Diego Medina wrote: > > The use of SyncWrites=false on badger's benchmark was called out on reddit > and the benchmark author's reply was along the lines of "it's ok for our > use case to lose the last few [seconds|ms] of data" > > You draw your conclusion on where you want to keep your data. > > > > > > On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 2:33:02 PM UTC-5, dc0d wrote: >> >> Badger write performance is a bit worse than boltdb. And badger suggests >> to batch writes. But so does boltdb. >> >> At the same time at badger's GitHub page it says it has higher write >> performance compared to boltdb. >> >> Is there a sample of how to do high performance/throughput writes with >> badger? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
