Sure, using a type descriptor to implement the dynamic type is an implementation detail. but the fact that an interface value consists of a concrete value and a dynamic type is part of the spec. I find it unfortunate that there is no common agreement on the terminology. That's why I'm asking.
On Monday, November 27, 2017 at 2:58:21 PM UTC+1, Jan Mercl wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:43 PM Stefan Nilsson <trollerip...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > > Having a dynamic type does not imply having a/any type descriptor included > in the value of an interface variable. That's why it's an implementation > detail. > > > > -- > > -j > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
