On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Sotirios Mantziaris <smantzia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i see a lot of open source under MIT and Apache-2.0, which is pretty > straightforward and clean. > > > So far, all you've said is that BSD 3-clause "might be a problem for some," and that MIT and Apache 2 are "pretty straightforward and clean." Nothing stated explains what (if anything) is "a problem" about BSD 3-clause, or how any other license is better. Do you have any specific arguments you can make against BSD 3-clause, and, if so, any specific arguments *for* another license in contrast to the flaws in BSD 3-clause? I hate to turn the happy occasion of open-sourcing something into a tangent about licensing, so I'm creating this new thread. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
