On Saturday, 4 November 2017 11:52:05 UTC-4, Keith Brown wrote: > > Are there any native golang tools simar to this which work on > Windows/Linux/OSX? >
The Skylark interpreter doesn't make any particular assumptions about the CPU or OS, so it should be highly portable. Please file an issue if you find otherwise. On Thursday, November 2, 2017 at 9:42:27 PM UTC-4, Ben Hoyt wrote: >> >> I'm very curious how the performance of Skylark in Go compares to Skylark >> in Java (and CPython 3.6 for that matter) -- any benchmarks on that? >> > I don't have any rigorous comparisons, but my informal testing on a number of small benchmarks suggests that CPython is about 2x faster than Skylark in Go (in a single thread), and that Skylark in Go is about 10x faster than Skylark in Java. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
