Hi Egon
Thank you very much for your feedback. You confirmed my assumption about di
libraries in go and your links fortified this impression. Probably I have
to rethink some old C# habits and map them to a more go idiomatic style.
> It's difficult to evaluate the API because the examples aren't real-world.
>
Fair point, I'll check if I can use some real code from my other projects
for the examples.
> I would consider something like this instead of fluent interface:
>
> container := sting.NewContainer(
> UsefulStruct{"Very useful"},
> sting.NamedTransient("alsoUseful", &UsefulStruct{"More useful"}),
> )
>
>
Hmm... I like your idea, I take a note for the next version, but for the
current version I'll keep the public API. I don't want a bigger API so your
idea would replace the current builder.Register and builder.RegisteredNamed
functions.
Cheers,
Sandro
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
