Yup, and when l.Close is called, Accept returns, releasing the readLock.

https://github.com/golang/go/blob/2d69e9e259ec0f5d5fbeb3498fbd9fed135fe869/src/internal/poll/fd_unix.go#L321

On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 14:30:54 UTC+10, Shivaram Lingamneni wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 at 12:13:15 AM UTC-4, Dave Cheney wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 13:40:04 UTC+10, Shivaram Lingamneni wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 11:17:01 PM UTC-4, Dave Cheney wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The already in use is probably coming from the TCP stack which waits a 
>>>> certain time before allowing the address to be reused. However I thought 
>>>> that the net package already used SO_REUSEADDR to avoid the delay in close 
>>>> to reopen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The question I'm really asking is not so much how to write code that 
>>>>> works in practice (or, rather, appears to do so), but how to be certain 
>>>>> (on 
>>>>> the basis of the specification and API documentation) that the code is 
>>>>> correct.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As written the code is correct. Once the listener is closed, you can 
>>>> reopen it, modulo TCP stack vagaries. 
>>>>
>>>
>>> The net package is indeed setting SO_REUSEADDR, which allows re-bind on 
>>> the address immediately after close(2). The problem is that close(2) is not 
>>> guaranteed to occur as a result of Listener.Close(), because of reference 
>>> counting of file descriptors. This is not an issue with the TCP stack; the 
>>> runtime is simply failing to issue the required system call.
>>>
>>
>> I've had a look through the code for the TCPListener and I cannot see 
>> where the reference count is being bumped by accept. As far as I understand 
>> the *netFD returned from Accept is unassociated with the *netFD that is 
>> bound to a listening socket. 
>>
>
> On the one hand, I am more confident in the claim that "close(2) is not 
> guaranteed to occur as a result of Listener.Close()" than I am in the 
> specific explanation of `Accept()` holding a reference. On the other hand, 
> I think I found the relevant line of code:
>
>
> https://github.com/golang/go/blob/2d69e9e259ec0f5d5fbeb3498fbd9fed135fe869/src/internal/poll/fd_unix.go#L318
>  
>
> If I'm reading this correctly, this layer of Accept() acquires a 
> readLock() on the file, which includes a reference acquire:
>
>
> https://github.com/golang/go/blob/2d69e9e259ec0f5d5fbeb3498fbd9fed135fe869/src/internal/poll/fd_mutex.go#L216
>
> and then continues holding this reference when it "blocks" on 
> `fd.pd.WaitRead`.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to