On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Jakob Borg <ja...@kastelo.net> wrote:
> The clean way to do this, in my opinion, is to make your item/element a > type that knows whether it's failed or not. > > https://play.golang.org/p/K_t8iEZvUc > > You can also inject strings.Contains or similar using > https://golang.org/pkg/html/template/#Template.Funcs > > Or return the strings in two separate slices -- one for the "good" and the other for the failed. It would not only solve this problem, but allow you to separate the failed ones visually. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.