No but generally I would say that _everything_ is better today than lets say fifty years ago. Maybe every step wasn't better than the one immediately before but many steps later it surely is.
If there was a way to easily test language features as just pulling in the golango.org/x libs then this could be an iterative thing. Of course the amount of work for testing certain language features can be extensive so maybe it is unattainable. I think the Hotspot teams publish builds at certain steps to try out stuff (I could be wrong) but of course it is not generally used by most end users. mån 21 aug. 2017 kl 19:59 skrev Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com>: > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017, 19:32 Michael Jones <michael.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't think it's about language. I got downvotes immediately for my >> comments over the weekend. >> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/19623 >> >> Whatever the circumstances, any proposal will often have its detractors >> as the most immediate and vocal responders. Support may come later. >> >> Agree that openmindedness is key to innovation, of course. >> > > Agreed, but let me please note that, sadly, innovation does not > necessarily imply progress towards better whatever. > -- > > -j > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
