Never mind the tool is right I could print the error or something like
that, I assumed you couldn't do anything useful with the error anyway in a
defer
On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 2:05:39 PM UTC+2, Gert wrote:
>
> To pass errcheck I need to do something like
>
> defer func() { _ = resp.Body.Close() }()
>
> instead of
>
> defer resp.Body.Close()
>
> Is this something the errcheck tool can figure out to mark as valid
> instead or does the errcheck tool need help from the compiler so the second
> case is also ok?
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
