I want to process the ICMP error and implement UDP PMTU discovery,  so I 
have to call recvmsg with MSG_ERRQUEUE

It has been 4 years, any reasonable solutions for this problem??

在 2013年2月28日星期四 UTC+8下午9:31:54,Robert写道:
>
> +cc golang-dev 
> +bcc golang-nuts 
>
> Hello, 
>
> I would like to propose a change in the net package in the 
> {Read,Write}Msg* methods (they are to be new in Go1.1), so that they 
> allow flags to be passed in. As far as I know, the only way to read a 
> socket's error queue in Linux is to use recvmsg with MSG_ERRQUEUE flag 
> set. The {Read,Write}Msg methods don't allow flags to be passed in and 
> set them always to 0. 
>
> I propose that both ReadMsg* and WriteMsg* take an additional argument 
> for flags. This obviously exports system-specific flags out of the net 
> package, but we already do that in the other direction in these same 
> methods. ReadMsg should filter out MSG_WAITALL (because it seems 
> nonsensical or poorly defined for nonblocking operations); all other 
> flags from POSIX and Linux-specific ones seem not to interfere with 
> the assumptions related to the poll server or nonblocking behaviour. I 
> also propose that ReadMsgUnix set MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC, for similar 
> reasons we set O_CLOEXEC in open() (although I'm not sure if that 
> shouldn't be the domain of someone who actually uses SCM_RIGHTS). For 
> WriteMsg* I didn't find any flags that would seem to interfere with 
> assumptions related to the poll server and nonblocking behaviour. 
>
> I will send a CL upon request; I didn't do it first because the 
> contributing guidelines strongly advise against that. This is a change 
> that, as far as I understand the backwards compatibility guarantees, 
> should be made before Go1.1 or not at all in the foreseeable future. 
>
> Robert 
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Mikio Hara <mikioh...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote: 
> >> Would adding a way to call ReadMsg with flags be reasonable? 
> > 
> > And WriteMsg too? Not sure, but Read/WriteMsgIP, UDP methods 
> > are new API for Go 1.1. I think you can contribute a bugfix patch 
> > until Go 1.1 cutoff if you think that's an API design bug. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to